HomeDirect TaxITR Non-Filing by Suppliers Alone Can’t Justify Disallowance of Purchases: ITAT Deletes...

ITR Non-Filing by Suppliers Alone Can’t Justify Disallowance of Purchases: ITAT Deletes of Rs. 25.55 Crore Addition

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that mere non-filing or alleged irregular filing of income tax returns by suppliers is not sufficient to treat purchases as bogus, and on that basis dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against deletion of a Rs. 25.55 crore addition made on alleged non-genuine purchases. The…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 15, 2026.GSTSTRICT LIMITS ON GST CONFISCATION...

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

GST Refund Can’t Be Withheld During Tribunal Appeal Without Specific S. 54(11) Order: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court has held that the Revenue cannot withhold a GST refund...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 15, 2026.GSTSTRICT LIMITS ON GST CONFISCATION...

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...