Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxITAT Third Member Deletes Demand of Rs 549 Cr Against Microsoft India...

ITAT Third Member Deletes Demand of Rs 549 Cr Against Microsoft India Citing Limitation Ground

Published on

๐Ÿš€ Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has d๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒd ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฅ๐˜€ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿต ๐—–๐—ฟore against ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ณ๐˜ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ citing limitation.

The bench of Mahavir Singh, Vice President (Third Member) has sided with the Judicial Member. Relying on Section 144C(13) read with provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000, he held that the receipt of DRP directions occurred when they were uploaded on the ITBA portal on April 1, 2022, making the last permissible date for passing the final assessment May 31, 2022 . Consequently, the order dated June 30, 2022, was held to be time-barred.

The matter arose from an assessment order dated June 30, 2022, issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) of the Act by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1), Delhi, following directions from the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). Microsoft India, represented by counsel Shri Nageswar Rao, contested the order on the preliminary ground that it was passed beyond the statutory time limit.

Core Issue: Date of Receipt of DRP Directions

The DRP issued its directions on March 23, 2022, which were uploaded on the Income Tax Business Application (ITBA) portal on April 1, 2022, and communicated to the Assessing Officer through speed post on April 4, 2022 . As per Section 144C(13), the Assessing Officer must complete the assessment โ€œwithin one month from the end of the monthโ€ in which such directions are received.

Microsoft argued that since the directions were received in April 2022, the assessment should have been completed by May 31, 2022. However, the order was passed only on June 30, 2022, rendering it void.

Divergence of Opinion Within ITAT

The Judicial Member (Shri Vikas Awasthy) agreed with the assessee, holding the assessment order to be time-barred and without jurisdiction . Conversely, the Accountant Member (Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh) dismissed Microsoftโ€™s plea, ruling that the order was within limitation since the jurisdictional Assessing Officer formally received the DRP directions on May 20, 2022, thus making the June 30, 2022 order valid .

Due to this split, the matter was referred to the Honโ€™ble President of ITAT under Section 255(4), who appointed Vice President Shri Mahavir Singh as Third Member.

The tribunal allowed the appeal.

Case Details

Case Title: Microsoft Corporation (India) P. Ltd Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax

Case No.: ITA NO.1862/DEL/2022 (A.Y.2017-18)

Date: 04/09/2025

Counsel For  Appellant: Nageswar Rao

Counsel For Respondent: Rajesh Kumar

Read More: Can AO Review His Own Findings From Original Assessment Under New Reassessment Regime? Gujarat HC Answers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRC-01 Canโ€™t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTATย ย 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Hereโ€™s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...

18% GST On New Water Pipeline Construction: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has ruled that works involving the...

More like this

DRC-01 Canโ€™t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTATย ย 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Hereโ€™s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...