Income Tax Dept. Acted Contrary to Earlier Court Directions by Issuing 5.25% TDS Withholding Certificate Instead of Nil Rate to E&Y: Delhi HC

HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. Acted Contrary to Earlier Court Directions by Issuing 5.25%...

Income Tax Dept. Acted Contrary to Earlier Court Directions by Issuing 5.25% TDS Withholding Certificate Instead of Nil Rate to E&Y: Delhi HC

Direct Tax

Published on

23/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Income Tax Dept. Acted Contrary to Earlier Court Directions by Issuing 5.25% TDS Withholding Certificate Instead of Nil Rate to E&Y: Delhi HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to issue a Nil-rate Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) certificate to Ernst & Young LLP under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the tax authority had acted contrary to earlier court directions by issuing a certificate prescribing a 5.25% withholding rate. The…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
TDS Withholding Certificate

Income Tax Dept. Acted Contrary to Earlier Court Directions by Issuing 5.25% TDS Withholding Certificate Instead of Nil Rate to E&Y: Delhi HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

About us

Company

Categories