Income Tax Prosecution U/s 276CC: Allahabad High Court Stays Non-Bailable Warrants Pending Compounding Decision

HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Prosecution U/s 276CC: Allahabad High Court Stays Non-Bailable Warrants Pending...

Income Tax Prosecution U/s 276CC: Allahabad High Court Stays Non-Bailable Warrants Pending Compounding Decision

Direct Tax

Published on

19/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has stayed the operation of non-bailable warrants issued against Shafaat Ejaz Siddiqui in a complaint filed under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The interim protection was granted to enable the applicant to move an application for compounding of the offence before the competent authority….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Income Tax Prosecution

Income Tax Prosecution U/s 276CC: Allahabad High Court Stays Non-Bailable Warrants Pending Compounding Decision

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

About us

Company

Categories