Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxDelhi HC Allows Income Tax Assessment to Proceed Despite Dual PAN Dispute

Delhi HC Allows Income Tax Assessment to Proceed Despite Dual PAN Dispute

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has permitted the Income Tax Department to proceed with assessment and reassessment proceedings against an assessee notwithstanding the existence of two Permanent Account Numbers (PANs), while directing the authorities to cancel the duplicate PAN to prevent further administrative confusion. The bench of Justice Dinesh Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar allowed the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A Mismatch Cannot Trigger 100% Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has ruled that a mismatch between...

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Trigger 100% GST Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has held that discrepancies detected...

Processed Milk Used in Confectionery Production Is Not Exempted Final Product: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Must Be Reversed Once Provision for Partial Write-Off Is Created; Subsequent Use Must Be Proved With Records: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Mere GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A Mismatch Cannot Trigger 100% Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has ruled that a mismatch between...

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Trigger 100% GST Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has held that discrepancies detected...

Processed Milk Used in Confectionery Production Is Not Exempted Final Product: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...