Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxFuture Amendment Denying Depreciation On Goodwill Can’t Be The Basis For Reopening...

Future Amendment Denying Depreciation On Goodwill Can’t Be The Basis For Reopening Assessment: Gujarat High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has held that future amendment denying depreciation on goodwill cannot be the basis for reopening assessment.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray has observed that the provision of section 43(6)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not amended at the relevant point of time for AY 2017-18 and therefore, the amended provision denying the depreciation on goodwill which came into effect from 01.04.2021 could not have formed the basis for re-opening to come to the conclusion that there is escapement of income by claiming of depreciation on goodwill.

The appellant/assessee company has created goodwill of Rs.11,00,000 on slump sale and claimed depreciation on the same in its ITR and Tax Audit Report. The Tax Auditor has reported in tax audit report that the assessee has made addition in block of intangible assets to the tune of Rs.4,29,94,061 which is inclusive of amount of goodwill of Rs.11,02,868/-.

Read More: Section 148 Can’t Be Invoked For Change In Tax Rate For Future AYs: Bombay High Court

The Assessing Officer on the basis of the material available on record has prima facie come to the conclusion that there is escapement of income as the issue of foreign profit/loss was not at all considered by the then Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer in the reasons for re-opening has categorically observed that escapement of income is mainly on wrong claim of depreciation on goodwill.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the reassessment proceedings on the grounds that thenotice for re-opening was based on mere change of opinion as the case of the petitioner was selected for scrutiny and issues on hand were examined at the original assessment stage by the then Assessing Officer and relied upon the reply filed by the petitioner in response to the notice.

The court held that the Assessing Officer could not have assumed the jurisdiction to re-open the assessment. The notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is quashed and set aside. 

Case Details

Case Title: GTPL Hathway Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1)(1) & Anr.

Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 2437 Of 2022

Date: 03/02/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Tushar Hemani, Senior Advocate With
Ms Vaibhavi K Parikh

Counsel For Respondent: Varun K.Patel

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...

S. 106 Can’t Replace Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Man in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Calls Investigation ‘Shoddy’

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted in a kidnapping and murder case...

More like this

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...