HomeDirect TaxFinance Act, 2026 Amendment to S. 147A Can’t Apply Retrospectively to Earlier...

Finance Act, 2026 Amendment to S. 147A Can’t Apply Retrospectively to Earlier ITAT Orders: Telangana High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Telangana High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department, holding that an amendment introduced through the Finance Act, 2026 to the proviso to Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be relied upon to challenge an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order that was passed before the amendment came into force. 

The Bench of Justice P. Sam Koshy and Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda has observed that the ITAT’s impugned order had been passed in November 2025, much before the Finance Act, 2026 amendment was enacted by Parliament. Therefore, the Tribunal could not have been expected to apply a statutory amendment that did not exist when it rendered its decision. 

The appeal was preferred by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Hyderabad, challenging the order passed by the Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench of the ITAT in ITA No. 1231/Hyd/2024 relating to Assessment Year 2016-17. 

Buy Now: Think Before You Pay Cash: 50+ Landmark Rulings on Section 40A(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961

The department primarily argued that the Tribunal ought to have taken into account the amendment introduced to the proviso to Section 147A by the Finance Act, 2026, while deciding the matter. 

The High Court found no merit in the Department’s contention.

The Court further noted that, at the time the Tribunal decided the appeal, there were numerous binding judgments of the jurisdictional High Court governing the issue and laying down the applicable legal position. Consequently, the Tribunal had correctly applied the law as it stood on that date. 

The court held that the ITAT’s findings could neither be regarded as contrary to the law prevailing at the relevant time nor as contrary to the evidence available on record. Since the Revenue failed to demonstrate any substantial question of law requiring adjudication, the High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal’s order. 

Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed, with the Court directing that there would be no order as to costs. It also ordered that all pending miscellaneous applications, if any, would stand closed. 

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Govt Extends Zero Customs Duty on 40 Critical Petrochemical Imports Till July 15 to Cushion Supply Chain Disruptions

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

NCLAT Upholds Full Provident Fund & Gratuity Payments to Jet Airways Workmen Outside Liquidation Estate Under IBC

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi Bench has held that provident...

S. 54 Exemption Allowed for Multiple New Houses Where Capital Gains Arise from Sale of Multiple Residential Properties: ITAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Software Subscription Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that receipts...

Inland Haulage Charges Can’t Be Taxed Separately When Linked to International Shipping: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that Inland...

More like this

NCLAT Upholds Full Provident Fund & Gratuity Payments to Jet Airways Workmen Outside Liquidation Estate Under IBC

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi Bench has held that provident...

S. 54 Exemption Allowed for Multiple New Houses Where Capital Gains Arise from Sale of Multiple Residential Properties: ITAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Software Subscription Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that receipts...