Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxFalse Submissions in Income Tax Reassessment Case Deprecated: Allahabad High Court Dismisses...

False Submissions in Income Tax Reassessment Case Deprecated: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Writ Petition

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by New Adil Educational Society, Hardoi, while strongly condemning the conduct of the petitioner’s counsel for making misleading submissions before the Court.

The bench of  Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary observed that the coordinate Bench had only restricted proceedings relating to Section 56 of the Income Tax Act. It had expressly permitted the Income Tax Department to continue proceedings on other issues not connected to Section 56. The reassessment in the present case, being based on alleged unexplained investments under Section 69, was therefore well within the scope permitted by the earlier order. 

BUY NOW: Income Tax Monthly E-Compilation : March 2026

The case arose from a reassessment order dated March 20, 2026, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner contended that the reassessment proceedings were in violation of an earlier order dated November 29, 2024, passed by a coordinate Bench of the Court.

However, the court found this submission to be factually incorrect and misleading.

The Court observed that the petitioner’s counsel repeatedly argued that the earlier order had granted blanket protection against any reassessment proceedings, which was contrary to the record. The Bench held that such submissions were not only false but were made with the intent to mislead the Court.

Strongly disapproving of this conduct, the Court remarked that the practice of making false submissions to “hoodwink the Court” must be deprecated. It further noted that the petitioner had attempted to obtain relief by suppressing material facts and misrepresenting the contents of the earlier order.

While the Court observed that such conduct warranted imposition of costs, it refrained from doing so in view of the unconditional apology tendered by the counsel. Instead, the Court issued a stern warning and dismissed the writ petition.

Case Details

Case Title: New Adil Educational Society Hardoi Versus UOI

Case No.: Writ Tax No. – 521 Of 2026

Date: 07/04/2026

Counsel For  Petitioner: Ajay Pratap Singh

Counsel For Respondent: A.S.G.I., Kushagra Dikshit

Read More: SCN Merely Stated Premises Not Found, Didn’t Allege Non-Conduct of Business, GST Registration Can’t Be Cancelled: Allahabad HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

24.186 Kg Hydroponic Ganja Carried in 2 Trolley Bags Is Commercial Quantity: Karnataka High Court Denies Bail

The Karnataka High Court has denied regular bail to a man accused of carrying...

Rs. 31 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Involving Walnuts, Raisins Imports: Bombay High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Bombay High Court has refused anticipatory bail to two persons accused of acting...

More like this

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

24.186 Kg Hydroponic Ganja Carried in 2 Trolley Bags Is Commercial Quantity: Karnataka High Court Denies Bail

The Karnataka High Court has denied regular bail to a man accused of carrying...