Kerala HC Quashes Faceless Appeal Rejection for 88-Year-Old Taxpayer, Says Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Non-Appearance

HomeDirect TaxKerala HC Quashes Faceless Appeal Rejection for 88-Year-Old Taxpayer, Says Appeal Can’t...

Kerala HC Quashes Faceless Appeal Rejection for 88-Year-Old Taxpayer, Says Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Non-Appearance

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

26/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Kerala HC Quashes Faceless Appeal Rejection for 88-Year-Old Taxpayer, Says Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Non-Appearance

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has set aside an order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) that had dismissed her income-tax appeal solely on the ground of non-appearance of the 88-year-old taxpayer from Ernakulam. The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. observed that the first appellate authority is statutorily bound to decide appeals on merits…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Faceless Appeal Rejection

Kerala HC Quashes Faceless Appeal Rejection for 88-Year-Old Taxpayer, Says Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Non-Appearance

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories