HomeDirect TaxPunjab & Haryana High Court Extends Deadline for Filing Audit Case Returns...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Extends Deadline for Filing Audit Case Returns by One Month

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab & Haryana High Court today disposed of CWP No. 28685 of 2025 Taxation Bar Association, Pathankot vs. Union of India & Anr., directing an extension of the due date for filing Income Tax Audit Case Returns by one month. The extension comes in response to the absence of specific instructions from the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) counsel during the court proceedings.

The petition was filed by the Taxation Bar Association, Pathankot, seeking relief in view of practical difficulties faced by taxpayers and professionals in completing tax audit-related filings within the existing deadlines under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

During the hearing, the Court noted that the CBDT representative did not present any written instructions or clarifications regarding the due date extensions sought. Considering the circumstances and to avoid hardship to taxpayers, the Hon’ble Court ordered that the last date for filing returns in audit cases be extended by an additional one month in accordance with statutory provisions.

Read More: Himachal Pradesh HC Directed CBDT to Extend ITR Due Date

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : FEBRUARY 24, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 24, 2026.GSTMERITS MUST PREVAIL OVER TECHNICAL...

S. 7 IBC Applications Must Be Admitted in Absence of DTD-Compliant Restructuring: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that Section 7 IBC applications must be admitted in...

IBC Overrides Defunct Companies Act Scheme: SC Restores CIRP Against Corporate Debtor

The Supreme Court has held that a long-pending and procedurally non-compliant Scheme of Arrangement...

DGFT Exempts ITC HS Chapters 01–24 from Reduced RoDTEP Rates Notified on February 23

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has issued a corrigendum clarifying that the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : FEBRUARY 24, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 24, 2026.GSTMERITS MUST PREVAIL OVER TECHNICAL...

S. 7 IBC Applications Must Be Admitted in Absence of DTD-Compliant Restructuring: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that Section 7 IBC applications must be admitted in...

IBC Overrides Defunct Companies Act Scheme: SC Restores CIRP Against Corporate Debtor

The Supreme Court has held that a long-pending and procedurally non-compliant Scheme of Arrangement...