Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCBDT Issues Clarification On Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 

CBDT Issues Clarification On Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBDT) has issued the clarification Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024.

While implementing the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, several difficulties have arisen in situations. Where, an order in case of a person had been passed on or before the specified date i.e. the 22nd day of July, 2024. Where the time for filing an appeal in respect of such order was available as on the said date. Where appeal in respect of such order was filed after the said date within the stipulated time as applicable for filing of such appeal; and appeal is filed without any application for condonation of delay.

Now Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 98 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, the Central Government passed the order to remove the difficulty. 

Read More: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Constitutional Validity Of Explanations 1 and 4 Of Section 17(2) Of Income Tax Act By Banks Officers

The Board clarified that in the case of such a person, appeal shall be considered as pending as on the 22nd day of July, 2024 for the purposes of the Scheme.

The Board stated that a person shall be considered as an appellant for the purposes of the said Scheme. The disputed tax shall be calculated on the basis of appeal; and the provisions of the Scheme and the rules framed thereunder shall apply accordingly in such a case.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...