Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxCA Raises Alarm Over Rs. 5K Late Fee in ITR Filing Despite...

CA Raises Alarm Over Rs. 5K Late Fee in ITR Filing Despite Deadline Extension

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A prominent chartered accountant has sparked a debate on social media after publicly questioning a Rs. 5,000 late fee imposed under the Income Tax Act, despite the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) officially extending the filing deadline.

In a widely circulated post on X (formerly Twitter), CA Sumit Sharma tagged the official handle of the Income Tax Department (@IncomeTaxIndia), demanding clarity on the computation and due dates of Income Tax Returns (ITR).

“What the hell is this?? Why this late fees for 5000?? What is due date of ITR??” Sharma wrote, attaching a screenshot showing no interest levied under Sections 234B and 234C, but a flat ₹5,000 fee under Section 234F.

Section 234F of the Income Tax Act provides for a penalty if the return of income is not furnished within the prescribed due date. Ordinarily, for most individual taxpayers whose accounts are not required to be audited, the due date for filing ITR for the assessment year 2025–26 was July 31, 2025. However, the CBDT recently extended this due date to September 15, 2025, in view of technical issues and representations from taxpayers and professionals.

Despite this extension, Sharma’s post suggests that the income tax portal has continued to levy the maximum late fee of ₹5,000, raising concerns about whether the system has been updated to reflect the new deadline.

Several tax professionals have echoed similar confusion, urging the authorities to issue clear guidance and ensure the e-filing platform’s calculations are aligned with the extended timelines.

The Income Tax Department has not yet issued a formal response to the query.

Tax experts recommend that taxpayers verify their filing dates carefully and retain documentation of any extensions notified by CBDT. If returns are filed before the extended due date of September 15, 2025, no late fees should ordinarily be levied under Section 234F.

As the deadline extension was meant precisely to avoid such penalties, instances of grievances are likely to surge in the coming weeks unless the issue is resolved and the portal is updated accordingly.

Read More: ED Conducts First-Ever Search in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Unearths Rs. 500 Cr Loan Scam Linked to Ex-MP

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...