HomeDirect TaxBinny Bansal’s Non-Resident Claim Rejected; ITAT Denies India–Singapore DTAA Relief on Flipkart...

Binny Bansal’s Non-Resident Claim Rejected; ITAT Denies India–Singapore DTAA Relief on Flipkart Share Sale

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bengaluru Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has rejected claims made by Flipkart co-founder Binny Bansal that he was a non-resident of India for the financial year 2019–20, thereby denying him tax relief under the India–Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The bench of Prashant Maharishi (Vice President) And Keshav Dubey (Judicial…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

More like this

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...