Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxAssessment Order Passed Beyond Limitation Period Invalid; Rs. 287 Crore Addition Based...

Assessment Order Passed Beyond Limitation Period Invalid; Rs. 287 Crore Addition Based on Third-Party Seized Material Quashed: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has granted major relief to Chennamaneni Mithun Chand by quashing an assessment order that had resulted in an addition of Rs. 287 crore under Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act.  The bench of Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President) and Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member) has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept.’s Inability to Reconcile 4.5 Lakh E-Way Bills Raises Prima Facie Concern: Gujarat High Court Continues Interim Protection to Ford India

The Gujarat High Court has continued interim protection granted to Ford India Private Limited...

S. 153C Notice Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Falls After April 1, 2021: ITAT Quashes 7 Years’ Assessments

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed assessment proceedings...

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Questioning ITC Eligibility Without S. 73 or 74 Proceedings: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST Dept.’s Inability to Reconcile 4.5 Lakh E-Way Bills Raises Prima Facie Concern: Gujarat High Court Continues Interim Protection to Ford India

The Gujarat High Court has continued interim protection granted to Ford India Private Limited...

S. 153C Notice Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Falls After April 1, 2021: ITAT Quashes 7 Years’ Assessments

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed assessment proceedings...

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...