Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxAdvance Tax Paid on Due Date via Net Banking Can’t Attract Interest...

Advance Tax Paid on Due Date via Net Banking Can’t Attract Interest for System Delay: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that interest under Section 234C of the Income Tax Act cannot be levied where advance tax is paid through net banking on the statutory due date, even if the challan is generated the next day due to technical or banking system delays.  The…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Matter Over Failure to Consider Paper Book Filed With Rule 29 Affidavit

The Bombay High Court has partly set aside an order of the Income Tax...

Rs. 76.72 Lakh Demand Quashed After Adjudicating Authority Ignored CESTAT Order Upholding Refund: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside a demand of ₹76,72,000 raised against a...

More like this

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Matter Over Failure to Consider Paper Book Filed With Rule 29 Affidavit

The Bombay High Court has partly set aside an order of the Income Tax...