Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxS. 68 Addition Not Justified When Alleged Bogus Loan Is Repaid: ITAT

S. 68 Addition Not Justified When Alleged Bogus Loan Is Repaid: ITAT

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
S. 68 Addition Not Justified When Alleged Bogus Loan Is Repaid: ITAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act is not justified when an alleged bogus loan is repaid. The bench of T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member) and Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member) has observed that has quashed a Rs. 50 lakh addition…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Company & PMLA

Jewellery Sale Proceeds Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate; ₹19.17 Lakh Must Be Returned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...
Direct Tax

Income Tax Demand Can Be Stayed Without 20% Deposit Where Reopening Faces Limitation Challenge: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has granted an unconditional stay on an income tax demand...
GST

Multiple GST Proceedings Over Same Suppliers: Calcutta HC Directs Dept. To Share Findings For Adjudication

The Calcutta High Court has directed coordination between investigating GST authorities and the Directorate...
GST

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Justify GST Fraud Penalty; Specific Suppression Must Be Proved: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram, has set aside a penalty...

More like this

Company & PMLA

Jewellery Sale Proceeds Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate; ₹19.17 Lakh Must Be Returned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...
Direct Tax

Income Tax Demand Can Be Stayed Without 20% Deposit Where Reopening Faces Limitation Challenge: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has granted an unconditional stay on an income tax demand...
GST

Multiple GST Proceedings Over Same Suppliers: Calcutta HC Directs Dept. To Share Findings For Adjudication

The Calcutta High Court has directed coordination between investigating GST authorities and the Directorate...