PMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High Court Answers

HomeCompany & PMLAPMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High...

PMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High Court Answers

Company & PMLA

Published on

29/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gauhati High Court has held that the timing of property purchase is a crucial factor under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The bench of Justice Michael Zothankhuma and Justice Kaushik Goswami has observed that the property had allegedly been registered in the name of the appellant only during the period of commission…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
PMLA Attachment

PMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High Court Answers

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

About us

Company

Categories