HomeCompany & PMLAPMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High...

PMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High Court Answers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gauhati High Court has held that the timing of property purchase is a crucial factor under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The bench of Justice Michael Zothankhuma and Justice Kaushik Goswami has observed that the property had allegedly been registered in the name of the appellant only during the period of commission…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

COVID-19 Limitation Extension: Uttarakhand High Court Holds 90-Day Benefit Applies Uniformly

In a Ruling on the computation of limitation in the aftermath of the COVID-19...

Challenge to GSTIN Merger Not Fit for Appeal; Directs Review Before Single Judge: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that the challenge to the Goods and Service...

Ancillary Services Linked to Power Transmission Largely Exempt from Service Tax: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

More like this

COVID-19 Limitation Extension: Uttarakhand High Court Holds 90-Day Benefit Applies Uniformly

In a Ruling on the computation of limitation in the aftermath of the COVID-19...

Challenge to GSTIN Merger Not Fit for Appeal; Directs Review Before Single Judge: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that the challenge to the Goods and Service...