Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLATamil Nadu Government Challenges ED Raids on TASMAC in Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Government Challenges ED Raids on TASMAC in Supreme Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Tamil Nadu government has escalated its legal battle against the Enforcement Directorate (ED) by filing a petition in the Supreme Court, challenging the agency’s recent raids on the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC).This move follows the Madras High Court’s April 23 decision to dismiss the state’s pleas against the ED’s actions, allowing the agency to proceed with its investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The ED’s investigation centers on allegations of a ₹1,000 crore scam involving TASMAC, the state-run liquor retailer.The agency suspects that illicit funds were generated through inflated pricing of liquor bottles by manufacturers, with proceeds allegedly funneled into various channels, including the film industry.

In March, the ED conducted extensive searches at TASMAC’s headquarters, distilleries, and breweries across Tamil Nadu.These actions led to the interrogation of TASMAC’s Managing Director, IAS officer S. Visakan, and searches at the residences of several businessmen and a film producer.

The Tamil Nadu government has criticized the ED’s actions as politically motivated and an overreach of authority. State Minister Muthusamy condemned the raids, asserting that they were based on unfounded allegations and aimed at tarnishing the state’s image.

The Supreme Court’s response to the state’s petition will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of this high-profile case, which has significant implications for federal-state relations and the enforcement of anti-money laundering laws in India.

Read More: Top 10 Proven Tips for Junior Advocates to Earn Money in 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand Summary Can’t Include Tax Already Adjusted Against Payments: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has held that a discrepancy between a detailed GST adjudication...

DFIA Exports Ineligible For RoDTEP Benefits; Customs Directs Repayment With Applicable Interest

The Office of the Commissioner of Customs, NS-II, at Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House (JNCH),...

Rs. 80 Lakh GST ITC Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail To Worker Allegedly Paid Rs. 20K A Month To Front Firm Run By Others

The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to a man accused in a case...

More like this

GST Demand Summary Can’t Include Tax Already Adjusted Against Payments: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has held that a discrepancy between a detailed GST adjudication...

DFIA Exports Ineligible For RoDTEP Benefits; Customs Directs Repayment With Applicable Interest

The Office of the Commissioner of Customs, NS-II, at Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House (JNCH),...