HomeCompany & PMLAShare Market Scandal: Anand Rathi Settles SEBI Front-Running Case for Rs. 90.2...

Share Market Scandal: Anand Rathi Settles SEBI Front-Running Case for Rs. 90.2 Lakh

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a dramatic turn of events, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Limited has settled with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) over serious allegations of front-running in the shares of KPIT Technologies Limited—agreeing to pay a hefty ₹90.2 lakh to close the case.

The high-profile case accused the brokerage firm of violating multiple provisions of the SEBI Act, including failing to maintain transparency and due diligence in its dealings with Mehrangarh Financial Advisors Private Limited (MFAPL). SEBI alleged that Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers bypassed proper protocols by using its own employees’ email addresses for client trades and executing off-market transactions based on outdated authorizations.

Following the issuance of a Show Cause Notice in March 2024, the firm sought to resolve the matter without admitting or denying the charges. After a review by SEBI’s Internal Committee and the High Powered Advisory Committee, the settlement terms were finalized at ₹90,20,000.

The settlement was approved by SEBI’s panel of Whole Time Members in December 2024, and the amount was paid by the brokerage in April 2025. The case has now been officially closed as per SEBI’s settlement regulations.

However, the watchdog left the door open to future action, stating that the settlement could be revisited if any concealment or breach of the terms comes to light.

Case Details

Applicant Name : Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Limited

Settlement Order No. SO/AK/DS/2025-26/7814

Date: May 13, 2025

Read More: Centre’s Response on Actress Ranya Rao’s COFEPOSA Detention Challenge: Karnataka High Court 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Allows Refund of Extra Duty Deposit Paid Through Promoter Loan

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Inconclusive Lab Reports Can’t Decide Customs Classification: CESTAT Orders Retesting of Imported “Thinner” Goods

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Upholds Excise Duty Demand for Clandestine Clearances Based on Unretracted Confessional Statement

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

CESTAT Allows Refund of Extra Duty Deposit Paid Through Promoter Loan

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Inconclusive Lab Reports Can’t Decide Customs Classification: CESTAT Orders Retesting of Imported “Thinner” Goods

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...