PMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply: Bombay HC

HomeCompany & PMLAPMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply:...

PMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply: Bombay HC

Company & PMLA

Published on

29/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

PMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply: Bombay HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that a provisional attachment order (PAO) issued under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) automatically ceases to have effect after 180 days, and that the Supreme Court’s COVID-era limitation extensions do not apply to such statutory timelines. The Bench of Justice M.S. Sonak and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Provisional Attachment

PMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply: Bombay HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Employee Can’t Be Terminated for Non-Disclosure of Criminal Case He Was Unaware Of: Supreme Court

Unimpeachable Official Records Can Warrant Quashing of Criminal Proceedings at Threshold: Supreme Court

Trading While Possessing UPSI Is Insider Trading Even If Sale Was to Avoid Loss: Supreme Court Restores SEBI’s Disgorgement Order

Taxation and Other Laws Amendment Bill, 2026 Proposes Major Tax Reliefs for Foreign Funds, Diamonds and Electronics

More like this

Employee Can’t Be Terminated for Non-Disclosure of Criminal Case He Was Unaware Of: Supreme Court

Unimpeachable Official Records Can Warrant Quashing of Criminal Proceedings at Threshold: Supreme Court

Trading While Possessing UPSI Is Insider Trading Even If Sale Was to Avoid Loss: Supreme Court Restores SEBI’s Disgorgement Order

About us

Company

Categories