Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAPMLA Attachment Without Scheduled Offence Unsustainable: Chhattisgarh High Court

PMLA Attachment Without Scheduled Offence Unsustainable: Chhattisgarh High Court

Company & PMLA

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Chhattisgarh High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed multiple appeals filed by IAS officer Ranu Sahu and her family members, setting aside the confirmation of property attachments by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and held that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) attachment without scheduled offence is unsustainable. The Bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

18% GST On Works Contract Services By Kerala Water Authority From January 2022: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that the...
GST

DGGI Delhi | Overlapping ITC Proceedings Don’t Automatically Attract S. 6(2)(b) Bar: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the existence of earlier State GST proceedings...
GST

DGGI | S. 6(2)(b) CGST Bar Not Attracted Where CGST Proceedings Involve Distinct Allegations of Fraudulent ITC: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that subsequent proceedings initiated by Central GST department...
GST

Delhi High Court Upholds GST Search of Advocate’s Office

The Delhi High Court has held that an advocate-client privilege claim cannot, by itself,...

More like this

GST

18% GST On Works Contract Services By Kerala Water Authority From January 2022: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that the...
GST

DGGI Delhi | Overlapping ITC Proceedings Don’t Automatically Attract S. 6(2)(b) Bar: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the existence of earlier State GST proceedings...
GST

DGGI | S. 6(2)(b) CGST Bar Not Attracted Where CGST Proceedings Involve Distinct Allegations of Fraudulent ITC: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that subsequent proceedings initiated by Central GST department...