NCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders at Rs. 196.80 per Share

HomeCompany & PMLANCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders...

NCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders at Rs. 196.80 per Share

Company & PMLA

Published on

10/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

NCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders at Rs. 196.80 per Share

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has upheld the legality of Bharti Telecom Limited’s selective reduction of share capital and dismissed a batch of appeals filed by minority shareholders challenging the valuation and process adopted by the company. The bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Naresh Salecha (Technical Member); and Indevar Pandey…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Capital Reduction

NCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders at Rs. 196.80 per Share

Membership Required

Latest articles

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

GST Bank Attachment Can’t Continue Beyond 1 Year: Delhi High Court

Electronic Evidence, Kachcha Parchis and Natural Justice Claims Can’t Bypass GST Appellate Remedy: Delhi HC

More like this

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

GST Bank Attachment Can’t Continue Beyond 1 Year: Delhi High Court

About us

Company

Categories