Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAMinority Shareholders Can’t Be Unfairly Discounted in Quasi-Partnership Share Valuation Disputes:  Karnataka...

Minority Shareholders Can’t Be Unfairly Discounted in Quasi-Partnership Share Valuation Disputes:  Karnataka High Court 

Company & PMLA

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Karnataka High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has delivered a significant ruling emphasizing that valuation of shares in quasi-partnership companies must reflect equitable treatment and cannot mechanically apply minority discount to the detriment of minority shareholders. The Bench of Justice Jayant Banerji and Justice T.M. Nadaf passed the order on April 29, 2026, while adjudicating objections to valuation…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...
Direct Tax

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...
Indirect Taxes

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

More like this

Direct Tax

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...
Direct Tax

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...
Indirect Taxes

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...