HomeCompany & PMLAKotak Mahindra Bank Fraud Case : Patna ED provisionally Attached Movable And...

Kotak Mahindra Bank Fraud Case : Patna ED provisionally Attached Movable And Immovable Properties Worth Rs.1.66 Crore

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate, Patna has provisionally attached movable and immovable properties worth Rs.1.66 Crore (approx.) under the PMLA, 2002 in connection with the Kotak Mahindra Bank fraud case.

Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Patna Zonal Office has provisionally attached movable and immovable properties worth Rs.1.66 Crore (approx.) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 in connection with the Kotak Mahindra Bank fraud case.

ED initiated investigation on the basis of an FIR registered by Gandhi Maidan P.S. Patna and subsequent charge-sheet under various sections of IPC, 1860, alleging that fraudulent transactions totalling to Rs. 31.93 Crore from the bank accounts of Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA) cum District Land Acquisition Officer (DLAO) were executed and funds were siphoned off using bank accounts of various shells/dummy entities causing huge loss to government exchequer.

ED investigation revealed that one Mannu Singh and M/s Red Rose P L (Proprietor- Hemanshu Kishorebhai Trivedi), (both accused in this case) in connivance with the bank officials, were actively involved in siphoning off of public money from the bank accounts of CALA cum DLAO maintained with Kotak Mahindra Bank, Patna and its further diversion to various shell/dummy entities/persons. 

Funds of Rs. 3.05 Crore (approx.) and Rs.8.77 Crore (approx.) from the account of CALA CUM DLAO PATNA and PD NHAI PIU were received in the bank accounts related with Mannu Singh and M/s Red Rose P L respectively. After retaining / consuming part of the funds received, substantial funds were further transferred to various bank accounts of unrelated parties or withdrawn in cash by them.

ED investigation into the money trail led to identification of the bank accounts which received Proceeds of Crime (POC) and also two immovable properties (agriculture land) which have been acquired with POC. Accordingly, funds of Rs. 1.18 Crore (approx.) in the bank accounts (in the name of Mannu singh and other beneficiaries) and 2 immovable properties worth Rs. 48.80 Lakh (approx.) (in the name of Mannu Singh and his wife Reema Singh in Bhadohi, UP) have been provisionally attached.

Till date, ED has carried out searches at 06 locations in Patna, New Delhi and Bhadohi (UP) on 18.07.2023, 17.08.2023 and 02.01.2024 and seized Gold and Diamond jewellery and cash worth Rs. 1.38 Crore (approx.) and arrested 05 accused including Mannu Singh and Hemanshu Kishorebhai Trivedi who are currently in Judicial custody. ED has filed 2 Prosecution Complaints in this case before the Special Court (PMLA) wherein the Court has taken cognizance of the same.

Further investigation is under progress.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...

GSTAT Special Bench to Decide Whether Delay Beyond S. 107 Time Limit Can Be Condoned

The Special Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has decided...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...