Ask Jurishour AI

HomeCompany & PMLAED Summons Senior Advocate Pratap Venugopal Over Legal Advice in ESOP Matter

ED Summons Senior Advocate Pratap Venugopal Over Legal Advice in ESOP Matter

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has issued a summons to Senior Advocate Pratap Venugopal in connection with legal advice sought regarding the issuance of Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) to Dr. Rashmi Saluja, former chairperson of Religare Enterprises.

The advice in question was reportedly obtained from Senior Advocate Arvind P. Datar by Venugopal in his capacity as Advocate-on-Record and Partner at K J John and Co. Venugopal has since clarified that the legal opinion was sought by him during his tenure at the firm, prior to his designation as a Senior Advocate on 19 January 2025. He officially resigned from the partnership with effect from 31 January 2025, in compliance with the Senior Advocates Designation Rules.

Sources close to the development stated that Venugopal did not charge any fee for the opinion provided to Care Health Insurance Limited (CHIL).

The ED summons requires Venugopal to produce records related to his communications with CHIL and Religare Enterprises Limited (REL) concerning the legal opinion on the ESOP grant to Dr. Saluja, which followed its rejection by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI). He has also been asked to furnish details of any payments made by CHIL, REL, or associated entities in relation to the legal services provided.

Venugopal has been directed to appear before the ED’s Assistant Director in Mumbai on June 27.

Previously, a similar summons was issued to Senior Advocate Arvind Datar over the same matter. However, it was later withdrawn following widespread backlash from legal circles.

Read More: India Imposes Definitive Anti-Dumping Duty on Chinese Aluminium Foil Imports

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 20, 2026.GSTALLAHABAD HIGH COURT QUASHES BNS...

GSTAT Denies S. 128A Amnesty for Excess ITC Availed in December 2020 Despite Assessee’s Claim That Underlying Debit Notes Pertained to FY 2018-19

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that the...

Assessment Invalid Where AO Acted Under Directions of Superior Authority: ITAT Deletes Rs. 11.12 Crore ‘On-Money’ Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal...

No Pre-Deposit Where Proceedings Began Before 01.10.2025: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer on GST pre-deposit...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 20, 2026.GSTALLAHABAD HIGH COURT QUASHES BNS...

GSTAT Denies S. 128A Amnesty for Excess ITC Availed in December 2020 Despite Assessee’s Claim That Underlying Debit Notes Pertained to FY 2018-19

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that the...

Assessment Invalid Where AO Acted Under Directions of Superior Authority: ITAT Deletes Rs. 11.12 Crore ‘On-Money’ Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal...