Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAED Raids Multiple Locations in Tamil Nadu Over TASMAC Scam, Seizes Incriminating...

ED Raids Multiple Locations in Tamil Nadu Over TASMAC Scam, Seizes Incriminating Documents

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Chennai has raided multiple locations in Tamil Nadu over Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) Scam and has seized the incriminating documents.

ED, Chennai has conducted search operations at various premises across many districts of Tamil Nadu on 06.03.2025 under the provisions of PMLA, 2002, for various offences related to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) and its associated entities/persons. During the search operations, various incriminating documents were recovered and seized,” the press release read.

Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Chennai has conducted search operations at various premises across many districts of Tamil Nadu on 06.03.2025 under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, for various offences related to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) and its associated entities/persons.

ED initiated investigation on the basis of Multiple FIRs registered under various sections of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 related to various issues in the TASMAC. These FIRs fall into the categories of (i) TASMAC shops collecting excess amount than the actual MRP; (ii) Distillery companies offering kickbacks to the officials of TASMAC for supply orders; (iii) Senior officials of TASMAC indulging in collection of bribes from the Retail TASMAC Shops and for transfer and posting of TASMAC Staff, etc.

During the search action in the offices of TASMAC, incriminating data related to Transfer postings, Transport Tender, Bar Licence Tender, Indent orders favouring few distillery companies, excess charge of Rs. 10-30 per bottle by the TASMAC outlets involving the officials of TASMAC etc have been recovered. 

Evidence of manipulation in TASMAC’s transport tender allocations has been found. A glaring issue is the mismatch between the KYC details of the applicant and the Demand Draft (DD), suggesting that the final successful bidder did not even obtain the requisite DD before the application deadline. Additionally, tenders were awarded despite having only a single applicant in the final bid. TASMAC paid over Rs. 100 Crore annually to transporters.

In the allocation of bar license tenders by TASMAC, evidence related to the manipulation of tender conditions were found. One such glaring issue is that the applicants without any GST/PAN numbers and without any proper KYC documentation, were allotted the final tenders.

Evidences reveal direct communication between distillery companies and higher TASMAC officials, exposing efforts to secure increased indent orders and undue favours.

The findings established the occurrence of various offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and generated Proceeds of Crime (POC) as defined under the provisions of PMLA, 2002.

Searches revealed large-scale financial fraud involving distillery companies—SNJ, Kals, Accord, SAIFL, and Shiva Distillery—along with bottling entities such as Devi Bottles, Crystal Bottles, and GLR Holding, exposing a well-orchestrated scheme of unaccounted cash generation and illicit payments. Investigations reveal that distilleries systematically inflated expenses and fabricated bogus purchases, particularly through bottle-making companies, to siphon off over Rs.1,000 Crore in unaccounted cash. These funds were then used for kickbacks to secure increased supply orders from TASMAC.

Bottling companies played a critical role in this fraudulent scheme by inflating sales figures, allowing distilleries to route excess payments, which were later withdrawn in cash and returned after deducting commissions. This collusion between distilleries and bottling companies was done through manipulation of financial records, concealed cash flows, and systematic evasion. The findings confirm a network where unaccounted cash was deliberately generated through inflated and bogus expenses and subsequently utilized for purposes leading to huge profits.

Further, the role of employees/associates related to TASMAC, Distillery and Bottle-making companies along with other key associates in the illicit affairs related to TASMAC are being examined/probed.

Click Here To Read The Press Release

Read More: GST Deputy Commissioner Sanjay Singh Commits Suicide, Extreme Work Pressure Suspected

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

18% GST On Works Contract Services By Kerala Water Authority From January 2022: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that the...

DGGI Delhi | Overlapping ITC Proceedings Don’t Automatically Attract S. 6(2)(b) Bar: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the existence of earlier State GST proceedings...

DGGI | S. 6(2)(b) CGST Bar Not Attracted Where CGST Proceedings Involve Distinct Allegations of Fraudulent ITC: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that subsequent proceedings initiated by Central GST department...

Delhi High Court Upholds GST Search of Advocate’s Office

The Delhi High Court has held that an advocate-client privilege claim cannot, by itself,...

More like this

18% GST On Works Contract Services By Kerala Water Authority From January 2022: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that the...

DGGI Delhi | Overlapping ITC Proceedings Don’t Automatically Attract S. 6(2)(b) Bar: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the existence of earlier State GST proceedings...

DGGI | S. 6(2)(b) CGST Bar Not Attracted Where CGST Proceedings Involve Distinct Allegations of Fraudulent ITC: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that subsequent proceedings initiated by Central GST department...