HomeCompany & PMLAChhattisgarh Liquor Scam: ‘He’s Not a Terrorist’ - Supreme Court Condemns ED’s...

Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam: ‘He’s Not a Terrorist’ – Supreme Court Condemns ED’s Midnight Arrest of Ex-IAS Officer

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has condemned the Midnight Arrest of an Ex-IAS Officer by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection to the chhattisgarh liquor scam and emphasised that the Ex-IAS was not a terrorist.

Former Chhattisgarh bureaucrat Anil Tuteja was permitted to withdraw his appeal contesting the validity of his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the Chhattisgarh liquor scam by the bench of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih.

The bench granted permission to Tuteja to prefer a bail plea instead.

The Court did, however, take issue with the ED’s actions in this case, including the way Tuteja was summoned and then arrested, even though it permitted withdrawal.

The court stated that “We need to document a really unsettling aspect of the case. On April 20, 2024, at approximately 4:30 p.m., the petitioner was seated at the Raipur ACB office. First, he received a summons to come to the emergency department at 12:00 p.m. While he was in the ACB office, he received another summons to appear before the ED at 5:30 p.m. He was then driven in a van to the emergency department’s office.”

The Court emphasized that he was arrested at 4:00 a.m. after being questioned by the ED all night.

“Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw and file petition for applying for bail. This deserves to be accepted. The disturbing feature of this case is that the petitioner was sitting at the CBI office in Raipur. He was summoned to appear at 12 pm. Another summon was served when he was at ACB officer and then he was asked to appear in ED office at 4:30 pm and interrogated all night and arrested at 5 am. The facts are glaring. ASG says remedial measures taken by ED and a press release issued so that such occurrences do not occur,” the Court noted.

Tuteja is one of the defendants in the Chhattisgarh liquor Policy fraud, which allegedly included illicit distillery commission collection and manipulation of booze distribution. In 2020, he was given anticipatory bail. In accordance with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, the Enforcement Directorate also began looking into associated money laundering charges. On August 20, 2024, the Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Tuteja’s request to have the arrest revoked.

Read More: Collection Of Funds In An Illegal Way To Commit Scheduled Offence In Future Does Not Amount To Money Laundering: Delhi High Court

Case no. – SLP(Crl) No. 12124/2024

Case Title – Anil Tuteja v. Union of India

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

‘Bail Is the Rule’: Maharashtra Court Grants Bail to Three Accused in ₹2.82 Crore DRI Firecracker Smuggling Case

Reiterating the settled principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception,"...

CJI Surya Kant Rebukes ‘Reckless’ Media Reports, Says No Plea Was Filed on CJP Protest Police Action

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Surya Kant on Friday strongly refuted media reports...

Cabinet Clears Tougher Anti-Paper Leak Bill; 10-Year Jail, ₹10 Crore Fine Proposed

A move aimed at restoring public confidence in India's examination system, the Union Cabinet...

Bombay High Court Notifies Special Courts for Trial of Paper Leak Cases Under Public Examinations Act, 2024

The Bombay High Court has designated Special Courts across Maharashtra to exclusively try offences...

More like this

‘Bail Is the Rule’: Maharashtra Court Grants Bail to Three Accused in ₹2.82 Crore DRI Firecracker Smuggling Case

Reiterating the settled principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception,"...

CJI Surya Kant Rebukes ‘Reckless’ Media Reports, Says No Plea Was Filed on CJP Protest Police Action

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Surya Kant on Friday strongly refuted media reports...

Cabinet Clears Tougher Anti-Paper Leak Bill; 10-Year Jail, ₹10 Crore Fine Proposed

A move aimed at restoring public confidence in India's examination system, the Union Cabinet...