CERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Attachment on Auctioned Property

HomeCompany & PMLACERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes...

CERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Attachment on Auctioned Property

Company & PMLA

Published on

24/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

CERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Attachment on Auctioned Property

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that a security interest registered with Central Registry of Securitisation Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India (CERSAI) prior in time will prevail over subsequent claims by tax authorities. The Bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat allowed a writ petition filed by Surendra Sadanand Kathole, quashing…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
CERSAI-Registered

CERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Attachment on Auctioned Property

Membership Required

Latest articles

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT

More like this

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

About us

Company

Categories