Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has urged tax professionals, researchers and industry associations to move beyond conventional demands for lower tax rates and sector-specific exemptions. She called upon stakeholders to identify outdated or unnecessary provisions that should be removed from the tax system—even when those provisions currently benefit their own industries.
Addressing the International Tax Research and Analysis Foundation’s 8th International Tax Conference in Bengaluru on Wednesday, Sitharaman said tax-policy recommendations should be supported by evidence, reliable data and a clear assessment of their wider implications.
The Finance Minister said proposals should specify the number of taxpayers likely to be affected, the compliance costs involved, the possible impact on government revenue and any unintended consequences that could arise from the recommended changes.
She said she would particularly welcome a submission acknowledging that a provision no longer serves the interests of an efficient tax system and should therefore be withdrawn, notwithstanding the benefit it presently provides to the sector making the recommendation.
The remarks signalled that the government expects industry bodies and tax professionals to take a broader and more objective view of tax reform instead of concentrating solely on concessions that benefit their respective constituencies.
Tax Reform Must Prevent Litigation
Sitharaman said the government’s approach to tax reform is directed at reducing the creation of fresh disputes rather than merely administering or clearing the existing litigation backlog.
According to her, the tax framework should make voluntary compliance easier for genuine taxpayers, while enforcement action should be reserved for matters that actually require intervention.
The Finance Minister referred to the enhanced monetary limits for filing departmental appeals as one of the steps taken to curb avoidable tax litigation. Under the revised thresholds, the tax department ordinarily does not pursue an appeal unless the disputed amount exceeds ₹60 lakh before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ₹2 crore before a High Court and ₹5 crore before the Supreme Court.
Higher appeal thresholds are intended to prevent government departments from contesting relatively low-value matters and to reduce the burden on appellate forums and constitutional courts.
Sitharaman’s comments also highlighted the need for tax policy to address the reasons disputes arise in the first place. Simplifying provisions, removing ambiguities and reducing unnecessary compliance requirements could help prevent disagreements between taxpayers and the authorities.
GST Process Reforms Likely at October 7 Council Meeting
Speaking about the continuing overhaul of the Goods and Services Tax framework, Sitharaman said the exercise described as “GST 2.0” had so far concentrated largely on the rationalisation of tax rates.
Process-related reforms, she said, were deferred and are expected to be taken up at the next GST Council meeting scheduled for October 7.
The Finance Minister explained that the urgency attached to reducing and rationalising GST rates resulted in the process-reform agenda being kept aside for consideration at the subsequent meeting in the first week of October.
Process reforms could include measures aimed at simplifying compliance, improving return filing, resolving procedural difficulties and reducing disputes between taxpayers and GST authorities. However, the Finance Minister did not announce the specific proposals that would be considered by the Council.
She also clarified that the government was not working on a separate “GST 3.0” framework at present. The ongoing reform exercise, she emphasised, continues to form part of GST 2.0.
Cryptocurrency Taxation Remains Under Discussion
Sitharaman also addressed the growing difficulty of applying conventional tax rules to the rapidly evolving digital economy. She identified cryptocurrency and cloud computing as areas presenting significant challenges for policymakers and tax administrations.
On cryptocurrency, the Finance Minister said the matter continued to be discussed in India and that the government had adopted a cautious approach while waiting for greater clarity and convergence among stakeholders.
In the meantime, India continues to tax virtual digital asset transactions, including through tax deduction at source. The present approach enables the government to track transactions and collect tax while the wider questions surrounding cryptocurrency regulation remain under consideration.
Her remarks indicated that taxation and regulation of cryptocurrencies are being treated as connected but distinct policy questions. Even in the absence of a comprehensive regulatory settlement, taxable transactions involving virtual digital assets remain subject to the applicable tax framework.
Cloud Computing Creates New Tax Questions
The Finance Minister said cloud computing raises even more fundamental questions for tax authorities because digital products and services may involve infrastructure, ownership, users and revenue streams spread across multiple jurisdictions.
She observed that it can be difficult to determine whether a digital product developed or supplied from India has underlying connections outside the country. Questions also arise over the ownership of cloud infrastructure, the location where a service is supplied and the jurisdiction entitled to tax the resulting income.
These difficulties challenge traditional tax concepts, which generally rely on identifiable factors such as the location of a business, a permanent establishment, the place of supply or the residence of the taxpayer.
Sitharaman said the taxation of cloud-based activity requires considerable examination because tax authorities must first understand who owns the system, where value is created and how a taxable connection with a particular country should be established.
Commercial Space Operations Should Be Taxed
Turning to India’s expanding space sector, Sitharaman drew a distinction between commercial activities and research and development.
She said commercial space operations should ordinarily be subject to taxation, as businesses earning income from such activities could fairly be brought within the tax net.
However, the government could adopt a more supportive or lenient tax approach towards research and development in the sector. Such a distinction could help encourage innovation and scientific advancement while ensuring that commercial ventures contribute their appropriate share of taxes.
The observations come at a time when India is seeking greater private participation in the space economy. The tax treatment of the sector is expected to become increasingly important as private entities enter satellite manufacturing, launch services, communication, data and other space-related businesses.
Finance Minister Responds to Negative Economic Commentary
Sitharaman also expressed concern over what she described as persistent negative commentary surrounding the Indian economy.
She said India was navigating global economic challenges in a manner that sought to protect its citizens from severe hardship and maintained that the country remained better placed than several other economies.
Her remarks appeared to call for a more balanced assessment of India’s economic position, taking into account the international environment and the government’s efforts to manage external pressures.
The Finance Minister concluded by urging tax professionals, research bodies and industry institutions to participate more constructively in policymaking. She said their contribution should extend beyond demands for favourable treatment and should include independent research, quantified recommendations and proposals aimed at improving the tax system as a whole.
Read More: JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026
