HomeColumnsHow Much Gold Can You Keep At Home Without Proof? CBDT Clarifies

How Much Gold Can You Keep At Home Without Proof? CBDT Clarifies

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has clarified that married women can up to 500 grams, unmarried women up to 250 grams and men (irrespective of marital status) up to 100 grams can keep gold at home without proof.

Possessing gold beyond these thresholds is not illegal, but it does require proper documentation to justify ownership. Individuals must be able to establish the lawful source of the excess jewellery through verifiable records such as purchase invoices or bills, Gift deeds or declarations or Documents of inheritance or will.

If such documentation is missing, or if the source of acquisition appears disproportionate to the individual’s declared income or financial background, the Income Tax Department is empowered to seize the unaccounted portion during search operations.

The CBDT circular of 1994 was introduced with the intent to prevent undue harassment and arbitrary seizure of family ornaments during income tax raids. Recognizing the cultural, social, and emotional significance of gold in Indian households—especially among women—the framework ensures that legitimate family holdings are respected and safeguarded.

Tax Implications on Sale of Gold

Merely owning gold does not attract tax liability. However, selling gold may lead to capital gains tax, depending on the duration of holding:

  • Short-Term Capital Gains (STCG)

If the gold is sold within 2 years of purchase, any profit is taxed as per the individual’s applicable income tax slab rate.

  • Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG)

If held for more than 2 years, profits are subject to a flat 12.5% tax rate, in accordance with recent amendments.

Maintaining clear and verifiable records of acquisition and sale transactions is crucial for accurate computation of gains and to avoid disputes with tax authorities.

Read More: Although Time For Reply U/s 73(1) of CGST Act Not Prescribed, Proper Officer Must Consider Assessee’s Response Before Passing Order: Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...

GSTAT Special Bench to Decide Whether Delay Beyond S. 107 Time Limit Can Be Condoned

The Special Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has decided...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...