HomeColumnsGST Refund Claims Get Stricter: Annexure-B Upload in JSON Utility Now Mandatory...

GST Refund Claims Get Stricter: Annexure-B Upload in JSON Utility Now Mandatory for Invoice Validation With GSTR-2B

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The GST system has now started requiring taxpayers to upload Annexure-B through the prescribed utility in JSON format while filing refund applications. The move is aimed at enabling system-driven validation of refund invoices directly with GSTR-2B data.

The latest development is expected to tighten scrutiny of Input Tax Credit (ITC)-based refund claims, particularly in cases involving exports, inverted duty structure refunds, and accumulated ITC claims.

Under the revised process, taxpayers are now required to prepare Annexure-B using the designated offline utility and upload the generated JSON file while filing the refund application on the GST portal. The system will automatically validate invoice details with the recipient’s GSTR-2B data.

Tax professionals say the change marks a shift towards deeper automation and invoice-level verification in GST refunds. Earlier, refund claims largely relied on manual reconciliation and document uploads. With the new mechanism, the portal itself will cross-check invoice eligibility and matching status.

One of the most important aspects of the new requirement is that taxpayers must now also specify the exact GSTR-2B period in which a particular invoice is reflected. This means merely mentioning invoice details may no longer be sufficient. Applicants will have to ensure that every invoice claimed in refund applications is traceable to the corresponding month’s GSTR-2B.

The system-driven validation is expected to reduce mismatches, duplicate claims, and disputed ITC claims. However, professionals warn that taxpayers may face practical difficulties where suppliers have delayed filing returns or where invoices appear in GSTR-2B in a different tax period.

The change is likely to increase the compliance burden on exporters and businesses claiming regular refunds, as they will now need more detailed reconciliation between purchase registers, GSTR-2B data, and refund statements before filing applications.

Experts are advising taxpayers to conduct invoice-wise matching of ITC records with GSTR-2B prior to preparing Annexure-B. Any discrepancy in invoice number, GSTIN, tax amount, or reflected period may result in validation failure or delay in refund processing.

The development also signals the GST Network’s continued push towards fully automated compliance verification and reduced manual intervention in refund sanction processes. Businesses are expected to increasingly rely on robust reconciliation systems and accurate vendor compliance tracking to avoid refund disruptions.

Read More: ICSI Urges MCA To Fix Login Errors

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

EDCT Machine Rentals Attract VAT as ‘Transfer of Right to Use Goods’: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has held that rental charges collected by banks from merchant...

SHIS Benefit Can’t Be Denied by Treating Capital Goods as Mere Parts; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.30 Crore Customs Demand

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Social Welfare Surcharge Payable Where Basic Customs Duty Is Fully Exempt Under MEIS/SEIS Schemes: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Registry Can’t Decide Complex Legal Issues: GSTAT Refers Appeal Over Pre-Deposit Linked to Amalgamated Entity 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hissar Registrar Court, has referred a...

More like this

EDCT Machine Rentals Attract VAT as ‘Transfer of Right to Use Goods’: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has held that rental charges collected by banks from merchant...

SHIS Benefit Can’t Be Denied by Treating Capital Goods as Mere Parts; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.30 Crore Customs Demand

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Social Welfare Surcharge Payable Where Basic Customs Duty Is Fully Exempt Under MEIS/SEIS Schemes: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...