HomeCase CompilationCESTAT Weekly Flashback: 4 To 10 May 2025

CESTAT Weekly Flashback: 4 To 10 May 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Customs, Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT) Weekly Flashback for the period 04 to 10 May 2025.

Expired Medicines Duty Case: CESTAT Clarifies Excise Duty Not Payable if Reasonable Time Was Given for Destruction Approval

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) while remanding the case of expired medicines duty has clarified that excise duty not payable if reasonable time was given for destruction approval.

Service Recipient  Liable to Pay Service Tax On Legal Fee Under RCM: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that business entities are liable to pay service tax on legal services under reverse charge mechanism (RCM).

12% Interest On Delayed Refund Of Service Tax Paid By Mistake: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that 12% interest on delayed refund of service tax paid by mistake.

Subscription And Redemption Of Liquid Mutual Fund Units Cannot Be Termed As “Trading Of Goods”: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that subscription and redemption of liquid mutual fund units cannot be termed as ‘Trading Of Goods’.

Setback To Royal Enfield: Refund of Service Tax Strictly Bound by Statutory Time Limit; Limitation Act Inapplicable: CESTAT

In a major setback to Royal Enfield, the Chennai Bench of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that  refund of service tax is strictly bound by statutory time limit and the Limitation Act is inapplicable.

Allegation Of Non-Verification Of Physical Premises Of Importer Not Sufficient To Fasten Customs Broker With Penalty: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that allegation of non-verification of physical premises of importer is not sufficient to fasten customs broker with penalty.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 11, 2026.GSTPRE-DEPOSIT FIELD NOW MADE EDITABLE...

Income Tax Dept. Introduces Form 121, Replaces Forms 15G and 15H

The Income Tax Department has introduced a new unified declaration form—Form No. 121—aimed at...

CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift under Finance Act, 2023

The article titled “CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A...

GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR

The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that while the “margin scheme”...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 11, 2026.GSTPRE-DEPOSIT FIELD NOW MADE EDITABLE...

Income Tax Dept. Introduces Form 121, Replaces Forms 15G and 15H

The Income Tax Department has introduced a new unified declaration form—Form No. 121—aimed at...

CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift under Finance Act, 2023

The article titled “CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A...