Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGrievance Redressal Committee Holds First Meeting of FY 2025-26 to Address GST-Related...

Grievance Redressal Committee Holds First Meeting of FY 2025-26 to Address GST-Related Issues

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The first Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) meeting for the financial year 2025-26 was convened on May 23, 2025, under the chairmanship of Shri Rajesh Sodhi, Principal Chief Commissioner, CGST & CX, Delhi Zone. The session was held at the Principal Chief Commissioner’s Office, I.P. Estate, New Delhi, with senior officials from the Centre and Delhi SGST, as well as representatives from leading trade and industry bodies.

This quarterly meeting aimed to systematically address taxpayer grievances and operational issues faced under GST, with a focus on transparent redressal in the presence of senior officers.

Key Stakeholder Participation

The meeting saw participation from representatives of:

  • CII (Confederation of Indian Industry)
  • ASSOCHAM
  • Sales Tax Bar Association
  • Federation of All India Vyapar Mandal (FAIVM)
  • PHDCCI
  • Confederation of All India Micro & Small Scale Industries
  • GSTN and departmental Commissioners and Joint Commissioners

Major Issues and Discussions

1. Concerns from Industry Bodies:

  • CII flagged dual taxation on re-imported goods and sought IGST exemptions. They also demanded a holistic approach to classification changes.
  • FAIVM raised concerns over harsh penalties on minor transport document errors and demanded leniency. They also highlighted confusion over post-sale discounts and pending appeals.
  • ASSOCHAM presented 13 key concerns, including technical glitches in GSTR forms, delays in appeal hearings and refunds, and procedural ambiguities in ISD mechanisms and e-invoicing.
  • STBA highlighted unjustified suspensions of GST registrations, procedural opacity in registration cancellation, and requested better centralization of CGST offices in Delhi.
  • PHDCCI called for avoidance of aggressive search operations in non-sensitive cases, simplification of movement of goods, and speedy resolution of pending Delhi SGST refunds.
  • CAMS sought complete digitization of taxpayer interactions and secure, QR-coded departmental communication.

2. GSTN and Policy-Level Recommendations:

Several matters, especially related to system functionalities (e.g., GSTR-5A for OIDAR services, acknowledgment for tax demand payments, and late fee visibility), were referred to GSTN. Others concerning legal clarity and procedural reforms were advised to be escalated to the GST Council or Board.

Trade Facilitation Measures

The Delhi GST Zone informed stakeholders of the following:

  • Launch of a dedicated grievance email: grievance.cgstdelhi@gov.in
  • Updated taxpayer-friendly website: gstdelhizone.gov.in
  • Expansion of outreach programs such as “Samvad” sessions
  • Issuance of Trade Notice No. 01/2025 detailing GRC functions and redressal mechanism

The Confederation of All India Micro & Small Scale Industries also appreciated a recent session on audit procedures conducted by the Audit-II Commissionerate.

Conclusion

The meeting concluded with an emphasis on continued collaboration between taxpayers and the tax administration, and a vote of thanks to the Chair. Stakeholders were urged to make regular use of the grievance redressal system to ensure constructive resolution of issues.

Read More: DRI Uncovers Rs. 20 Crore Import Duty Evasion in Luxury Furniture Scam

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...