No GST Exemption On Frozen Meat Products Packs Sold To Distributors Without Mentioning ‘Not for Retail Sale’: AAR

The Tamil Nadu Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that the goods and service tax (GST) exemption is not available on frozen meat products packs sold to distributors without mentioning ‘not for retail sale’.

The bench of B.Suseel Kumar and Balakrishna S. has observed that Hotels qualify as an ‘industrial consumer’ as per Rule 2(bb) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. The declaration ‘Not for Retail Sale’ is reportedly not affixed/printed in the packages, and therefore, such supplies are not exempted from payment of GST. However, on fulfilment of the requisite conditions, if such outward supplies are treated as Nil’ rated, ITC on the inward supply involved in such cases cannot be availed.

The applicant, M/s. Fairmacs Shipstores Private Limited is a company who are wholesale traders in liquor, frozen meat products, food products. They make supplies to hotels, other institutional customers and also to ships, consulates etc.

They have branches at Bangalore, Vizag and Kakinada. The applicant is mainly supplying frozen meat like fish, chicken, etc., and they also make supplies on branch transfer basis from Chennai to their Bangalore branch for which they have a GST registration in Bangalore. They are selling products packed in individual packs of 1Kg, 2Kg, 3Kg etc., to distributors with the marking For Institutional sale only’. 

The applicant has sought the advance ruling on the issue whether hotels qualify as industrial/institutional consumers as per Rule 2bb and 2bc of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011?

Yet another issue raised was as supply to institutions is not classified as ‘pre-packaged and labelled’, as per Rule 3(b) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, the applicant is of the opinion that such supplies are Nil’ rated. Whether the applicant’s understanding that ITC cannot be availed, as such supplies are Nil’ rated, is correct?

The AAR held that inter-branch transfers, since the requirement of affixing/printing the declaration ‘Not for Retail Sale’ is reportedly not made in the packages, such supplies do not fall under the exempted category. Since the mandatory requirement of declaration ‘Not for Retail Sale’ is not available in the packages instant case, and since the status of the distributor as a wholesale dealer is not clear/confirmed, the applicant should charge GST on such supplies to distributors.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: Fairmacs Shipstores

Ruling Date: 07.05.2025

Read More: Validity of TR-6 Challan for Import IGST Credit: Madras High Court to Examine

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
India Tightens GST Scrutiny on Foreign Digital Service Providers: DGGI Targets Non-Compliant Platforms

India Tightens GST Scrutiny on Foreign Digital Service Providers: DGGI Targets Non-Compliant Platforms

As India’s digital economy surges, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities…

Govt. Clarifies On Regularizing Payment Of GST On Skilling Services Provided By Training Partners Approved By The National Skill Development Corporation

The Government has issued the clarification on regularizing payment of GST on…

Madras HC Questions ED’s Authority to Seal Premises in TASMAC Scam Probe

In a significant development, the Madras High Court has raised serious doubts…
CBI Books Four CGST Officials for Illegal Search and Attempt to Extort Private Firm in Nagpur

CBI Books Four CGST Officials for Illegal Search and Attempt to Extort Private Firm in Nagpur

In a significant crackdown on corruption within government ranks, the Central Bureau…