HomeIndirect TaxesChennai Customs Seizes Contraband Worth Rs. 5.4 Crore in Major Smuggling &...

Chennai Customs Seizes Contraband Worth Rs. 5.4 Crore in Major Smuggling & IPR Violation Bust

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant crackdown on smuggling and intellectual property rights (IPR) violations, officers of the Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (SIIB–Sea) have seized two containers carrying undeclared goods valued at approximately ₹5.40 crore.

Based on intelligence developed by SIIB (Sea), 2 containers with undeclared 13500 pairs of Luofo & Crocs footwear and 16000 pcs. of Korean Cosmetic Brands were seized for attempted smuggling and IPR violation. The contraband valued around ₹5.40 Cr.

The seized consignments not only represent an attempt at economic fraud but also pose significant threats to consumer safety and brand integrity. The footwear bore logos and designs deceptively similar to globally registered trademarks, particularly Crocs, a brand well-known and protected under Indian IPR laws. The cosmetics, imported without mandatory clearances, could potentially violate health and safety norms.

Read More: CBI Arrests Additional Director General, Directorate of Taxpayer Services For demanding Rs 25 Lakh Bribe

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...