Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCommon Adjudication Authorities Appointed by CBIC for De-Novo Hearings in 100% EOU...

Common Adjudication Authorities Appointed by CBIC for De-Novo Hearings in 100% EOU Cases

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified the common adjudication authorities appointed for de-novo hearings in 100% Export Oriented Units (EOU) cases.

Customs officers who oversee 100% Export Oriented Units (EOUs) were earlier given the powers of Central Excise Officers through a 2001 notification.

Later, via notifications issued in 2003 and 2018, the responsibility for these EOUs was officially moved from Central Excise officers to Customs officers.

Now, under the powers granted by the Customs Act, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has decided:

If a case involves both customs duty and central excise duty for a 100% EOU — and it was originally decided by a Central Excise Officer under Rule 3 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 — but has now been sent back for fresh (de-novo) adjudication, then it will now be handled under the Customs Act as follows:

  1. If the total duty involved is up to ₹5 lakhs – the case will be decided by the Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction over that EOU.
  2. If the total duty involved is more than ₹5 lakhs but up to ₹50 lakhs – the case will be decided by the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Customs with jurisdiction over that EOU.
  3. If the total duty involved is more than ₹50 lakhs – the case will be decided by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs with jurisdiction over that EOU.

Notification Details

Notification No. 35/2025 – Customs (N.T.)]

Date: 16 May, 2025

Read More: GST Officer Caught Accepting Rs. 45,000 Bribe in Greater Noida; Vigilance Team Nabs Accused Red-Handed

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

More like this

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...