HomeColumnsHomebuyers To Avoid These Property Buying Mistakes: RERA ALERT

Homebuyers To Avoid These Property Buying Mistakes: RERA ALERT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) was established to protect homebuyers from malpractices in the real estate sector. 

While RERA offers a robust framework for consumer protection, its effectiveness is contingent upon the diligence of the buyer. Certain oversights can render RERA’s safeguards ineffective, leaving buyers vulnerable.

Here are six critical mistakes that can compromise your protection under RERA:

  1. Signing Agreements with Unilateral Clauses

Entering into agreements that heavily favor the builder can limit your ability to seek redress under RERA. Such clauses may restrict your rights and make it challenging to hold the builder accountable for defaults or delays.

  1. Making All-Cash Transactions at the Booking Stage

Opting for cash transactions without official documentation can be detrimental. These dealings lack legal backing, making it difficult to prove payments and seek remedies if disputes arise.

  1. Defaulting on Scheduled Payments

Failing to adhere to the payment schedule can lead to forfeiture clauses being invoked by the builder. This not only jeopardizes your investment but also weakens your position in any legal proceedings.

  1. Accepting Revised Possession Timelines Without Legal Consultation

Agreeing to extended possession dates without seeking legal advice can be risky. Such acceptance may be interpreted as consent, potentially limiting your ability to claim compensation for delays.

  1. Delaying the Filing of Complaints Against the Developer

Postponing the initiation of complaints can undermine your case. Timely action is crucial to ensure that your grievances are addressed effectively under RERA’s provisions.

  1. Relying on Pre-EMI, Subvention, or Rental Return Scheme

These financial schemes, often marketed by developers, may not be recognized or protected under RERA. Engaging in such arrangements without thorough understanding can expose you to financial risks.

Read More: Thiruvananthapuram Customs Seize Foreign Currency Worth Rs. 44.40 Lakhs at Cochin Airport

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CBIC’s Rs. 2 Crore Litigation Threshold Covers Ongoing Appeals, Not Just Fresh Filings: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the circular issued by Central Board of Indirect...

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : February 23, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 23, 2026.GSTGST Orders Passed Without Proper...

India, France Sign Landmark Protocol Amending Double Taxation Avoidance Convention

In a significant step towards deepening bilateral economic cooperation, the Government of India and...

S. 263 Revision Invalid Where AO Took Plausible View on Unlisted Share Gains as Capital Gains: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has held that revision under Section 263 of the Income...

More like this

CBIC’s Rs. 2 Crore Litigation Threshold Covers Ongoing Appeals, Not Just Fresh Filings: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the circular issued by Central Board of Indirect...

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : February 23, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 23, 2026.GSTGST Orders Passed Without Proper...

India, France Sign Landmark Protocol Amending Double Taxation Avoidance Convention

In a significant step towards deepening bilateral economic cooperation, the Government of India and...