HomeGSTMadras High Court Quashes Order Passed Against Non-Existent Entity Post-Amalgamation Despite Prior...

Madras High Court Quashes Order Passed Against Non-Existent Entity Post-Amalgamation Despite Prior Intimation

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has quashed the order passed against non-existent entity post-amalgamation despite prior intimation.

The bench of Justice Mohammed Shaffiq has observed that it is not permissible for the department to issue a show cause notice in the name of a company which stood amalgamated and proceed to complete the adjudication, in the name of the amalgamated/non-existent company.

The petitioner/assessee, Larsen and Toubro Limited has raised the issue whether it is permissible for the respondent authority to issue a show cause notice in the name of a company which stood amalgamated and proceed to complete the adjudication, in the name of the amalgamated/non-existent company.

The department  submitted that the respondent authority was not aware of the amalgamation. When the show cause notice was pointed, to state that the officer was informed and aware of the factum of amalgamation, the learned counsel for respondent would request liberty to proceed afresh against the resultant company.

The court quashed the proceedings against the amalgamated entity.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s.Larsen and Toubro Limited Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise

Case No.: W.P. Nos.23194 and 23200 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.24499 of 2021

Date: 17.04.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: G.Natarajan

Counsel For Respondent: Sai Srujan Tayi

Read More: Landmark Case Analysis: Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan – The Genesis of Workplace Sexual Harassment Law in India

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 15, 2026.GSTSTRICT LIMITS ON GST CONFISCATION...

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

GST Refund Can’t Be Withheld During Tribunal Appeal Without Specific S. 54(11) Order: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court has held that the Revenue cannot withhold a GST refund...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 15, 2026.GSTSTRICT LIMITS ON GST CONFISCATION...

ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...