Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationGovt Not To Levy GST on UPI transactions Above Rs. 2,000

Govt Not To Levy GST on UPI transactions Above Rs. 2,000

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The claims that the Government is considering levying Goods and Services Tax (GST) on UPI transactions over Rs. 2,000 are completely false, misleading, and without any basis. Currently, there is no such proposal before the Government. 

GST is levied on charges, such as the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR), relating to payments made using certain instruments.

Effective January 2020, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has removed the MDR on Person-to-Merchant (P2M) UPI transactions through the Gazette Notification dated 30th December 2019.

Since currently no MDR is charged on UPI transactions, there is consequently no GST applicable to these transactions.

The Government remains committed to promoting digital payments via UPI.

To support and sustain the growth of UPI, an Incentive Scheme has been operational from FY 2021-22. This scheme specifically targets low-value UPI (P2M) transactions, benefiting small merchants by alleviating transaction costs and promoting wider participation and innovation in digital payments.

The total incentive payouts under this scheme over the years reflect the Government’s sustained commitment to promoting UPI-based digital payments. Allocation under the scheme over the years has been:

         •       FY2021-22: ₹1,389 crore

         •       FY2022-23: ₹2,210 crore

         •       FY2023-24: ₹3,631 crore

These measures have significantly contributed to India’s robust digital payments ecosystem. 

According to the ACI Worldwide Report 2024, India accounted for 49% of global real-time transactions in 2023, reaffirming its position as a global leader in digital payments innovation.

UPI transaction values have seen an exponential increase, growing from ₹21.3 lakh crore in FY 2019-20 to ₹260.56 lakh crore by March 2025. Specifically, P2M transactions have reached ₹59.3 lakh crore, reflecting growing merchant adoption and consumer confidence in digital payment methods.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Read More: Level Up Your Legal & Tax Game at STAR SUMMIT 2025 — Applications Now Open!

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...