Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTOYO Faces FIR in Jaipur Over Alleged GST Fraud Involving Rs. 2.66...

OYO Faces FIR in Jaipur Over Alleged GST Fraud Involving Rs. 2.66 Crore At Samskara Resort

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Hospitality platform OYO is facing fresh legal trouble after a resort in Jaipur, Rajasthan, filed a police complaint accusing the company of financial misrepresentation that allegedly led to massive GST liabilities.

Madan Jain, owner of Samskara Resort, filed an FIR at Ashok Nagar police station alleging that OYO falsely inflated the resort’s revenue figures. This purportedly led to a ₹2.66 crore show cause notice from the GST department, despite the resort claiming actual earnings of only ₹10.95 lakh during their 12-month contract with OYO that began on April 18, 2019.

The FIR further alleges that OYO fabricated bookings for Samskara Resort for fiscal years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21—periods during which no agreement existed between the resort and the aggregator.

Jain contends that these “fraudulent” entries not only misrepresented business activity but also triggered a massive GST demand for taxes and penalties based on inflated sales figures reportedly amounting to ₹22.22 crore.

The controversy deepens as Hussain Khan, President of the Hotel Federation of Rajasthan, revealed that nearly 20 hotels have received similar GST notices allegedly due to OYO’s reporting practices. “OYO has a history of such actions,” Khan said, adding that the hotel industry in Rajasthan had previously launched a protest campaign, with over 125 hotels displaying banners refusing to accept OYO bookings.

This incident has reignited concerns among hotel operators about opaque billing and reporting practices by large travel-tech platforms, calling for tighter regulatory scrutiny.

Read More: Supreme Court Upholds Bar On Input Tax Credit for Exempt Sales Under VAT Act

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

More like this

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...