Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesKarnataka High Court Issues Notice to DRI on Kannada Actress Ranya Rao's...

Karnataka High Court Issues Notice to DRI on Kannada Actress Ranya Rao’s Bail Plea in Gold Smuggling Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) on the bail application filed by Kannada film actress Harshavardhini Ranya Rao, who has been arrested in connection with a high-profile gold smuggling case involving assets worth ₹15.29 crore.

The bench of Justice S Vishwajith Shettyissued the notice and scheduled the next hearing for April 17, 2025, instructing the DRI to submit its objections to the bail plea by then.

Ranya Rao, who is currently in judicial custody, had earlier approached both the Magistrate and Sessions courts, but her bail applications were rejected. The present petition before the High Court represents her latest legal attempt for release pending trial.

The case against the actress emerged following a major seizure by authorities at Kempegowda International Airport, Bengaluru, where gold bars worth ₹12.56 crore were recovered from her possession. A subsequent raid at her residence led to the discovery of gold jewellery worth ₹2.06 crore and ₹2.67 crore in cash.

She has been charged under multiple provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, specifically:

  • Section 135(1)(a), 135(1)(b)
  • Section 135(1)(a)(i)(a), 135(1)(a)(i)(b)
  • Section 135(1)(b)(i)(a), 135(1)(b)(i)(b)
  • As well as Sections 104(4)(a), 104(4)(b), 104(6)(a), and 104(6)(c)

These sections pertain to evasion of customs duty, smuggling, and offences involving significant commercial quantities of goods, which carry stringent penalties including imprisonment and heavy fines.

Interim Relief on Media Coverage

Meanwhile, the parents of the accused have also approached the High Court seeking relief from what they allege to be defamatory and false media coverage targeting their daughter and family.

In response, the Court has granted an interim order directing media outlets to refrain from publishing or broadcasting unverified or defamatory content relating to Harshavardhini Ranya Rao and her father K Ramchandra Rao, until further orders.

Case Details

Case Title: Harshavardhini Ranya versus Senior Intelligence Officer

Case No: Criminal Petition No 5047/2025

Read More: CBIC Rescinds Circular on Transshipment of Bangladeshi Export Cargo via India

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

Revenue Records Prove Possession, Not Ownership; Long Occupation Without Hostile Claim Can’t Establish Adverse Possession: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that entries in revenue records may constitute relevant evidence...

More like this

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...