Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTWhether Central GST And State GST Dept. Can Simultaneously Initiate Proceedings On...

Whether Central GST And State GST Dept. Can Simultaneously Initiate Proceedings On Same Subject-Matter? Patna High Court To Hear In April 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Patna High Court to hear on the issue of whether central GST and state GST dept. can simultaneously initiate proceedings on the same subject-matter in the month of April 2025.

The bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury has restrained the GST department to undertake any no coercive steps against the petitioner/assessee.

The petitioner/assessee, R.K. Enterprise has challenged the initiation of proceedings both by the State authorities and as also by the Central authorities, claiming that the same to be covered by the same subject-matter, and the consequential orders passed thereon by the Central authorities on 8th October, 2024 passed under the CGST Act, 2017 and the order dated 1st July, 2024 passed by the State Authorities under the WBGST Act, 2017, the instant writ petition has been filed.

The court, while noting that the subsequent order passed by the State authorities covers the portion of the self-same tax period and same subject-matter which form the subject-matter of adjudication made by the Central authorities on 24th October, 2024, opined that the writ petition should be heard.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s R.K. Enterprise Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Case No.: WPA 825 of 2025

Date: 05/03/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Bharat Raichandani

Counsel For Respondent: A. Roy

Read More: Existence Of ‘International Transaction’ Must Be Established Before Transfer Pricing Benchmarking: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...