CESTAT Upholds Service Tax On Legal Fee Expense

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the Service Tax amounting to Rs. 31800 on Legal Fee expense incurred by the appellant, Saisun Outsourcing Services during the period F.Y. 2016-17.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya Member (Technical) has observed that the appellant has shown Legal fees expense of Rs. 2,12,000/-in 2016-17. No submission was made by the appellant nor have they contested the applicability of Service Tax on the said expense. In absence of any reply or any supporting documents, Legal fees expenses incurred by the appellant are expenses towards Legal services.

The appellant/assessee was registered under Service Tax for providing services under Manpower Recruitment/Supply agency Services. The Commissioner also confirmed the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 31,800 in respect of legal & consultancy services under RCM under proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest. 

The appellant contended that service tax amounting to Rs. 31800 including Cess in respect of legal & Consultancy services under RCM should not be demanded and recovered from them under provisions of section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The Tribunal while dismissing the appeal, upheld the Service Tax on Legal Fee expense incurred by the assessee.

Case Details

Case Title: Saisun Outsourcing Services Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Goods, Service Tax, Jabalpur

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 54991 Of 2023

Date: 04.03.2025

Counsel For Appellant: None

Counsel For Respondent: Manoj Kumar

Read More: GST Dept. Issues Interest Recovery Notices For Delayed Outward Supply Declarations

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

CESTAT Allows Micromax Informatics To Raise Alternative Classification Of LED/LCD TV Panels And Accessories

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…

Section 26(5)(a) Of MVAT Act Prevails Over Rule 36(2): Bombay High Court

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court has held that Section 26(5)(a)…

Is Redemption Fine On Re-Export Imposable? Know 2 Contradictory Rulings

The issue, whether redemption fine on re-export imposable was answered by two…

Two Men Arrested for Smuggling 82 kg Peacock Tail feathers at IGI Airport

The Delhi Customs Department at IGI Airport under the leadership of Vishal…