HomeOther LawsPVR INOX Fined Rs.1.2 Lakh for Delaying Movie Screening with Excessive Ads

PVR INOX Fined Rs.1.2 Lakh for Delaying Movie Screening with Excessive Ads

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a landmark ruling for consumer rights, a Bengaluru consumer court has fined PVR INOX ₹1.2 lakh for delaying a movie screening by 25 minutes due to excessive advertisements. This decision sets a strong precedent against the exploitation of viewers’ time in cinemas.

Consumer Complaint Leads to Landmark Fine

A moviegoer had booked a 4:05 PM show for the film Sam Bahadur. However, the actual screening did not commence until 4:30 PM due to an extended ad segment. As per regulations, theatres can screen only 10 minutes of public service announcements (PSAs) before a film, but PVR INOX ran 25 minutes of ads, with only two out of 17 being PSAs.

Court Imposes ₹1.28 Lakh Penalty on PVR INOX

The court ruled in favor of the complainant, imposing a total penalty of ₹1.28 lakh, broken down as follows:

  • ₹1 lakh as punitive damages for violating consumer rights
  • ₹20,000 for mental agony caused to the viewer
  • ₹8,000 for litigation expenses

New Directives for Theatres

The court’s decision came with key directives aimed at protecting moviegoers:

  • Theatres must disclose the actual movie start time on tickets.
  • Theatres cannot exceed ad limits before screenings.
  • Ticketing platforms like BookMyShow are not liable for delays caused by cinemas.

Read More: Consolidated Notice Leads To Higher Pre-Deposit For Preferring Appeal: Kerala High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delay in Filing ITR Due to Probate of Will Is Bona Fide, No Penalty U/s 270A: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Bench has held that delay in filing an...

Vague Seized Material Without “Live Link” Cannot Justify Reopening Under Section 148: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the...

Is Police Bandobast for Paid Public Events Exempt from GST as a Sovereign Function or Taxable as a Service to Business Entities?

The question of GST applicability on police bandobast services arranged for private events has...

Debatable Issue Can’t Be Disallowed U/s 143(1)(a): Chhattisgarh High Court Quashes EPF/ESI Addition

The Chhattisgarh High Court has held that the Income Tax Department cannot make disallowances...

More like this

Delay in Filing ITR Due to Probate of Will Is Bona Fide, No Penalty U/s 270A: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Bench has held that delay in filing an...

Vague Seized Material Without “Live Link” Cannot Justify Reopening Under Section 148: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the...

Is Police Bandobast for Paid Public Events Exempt from GST as a Sovereign Function or Taxable as a Service to Business Entities?

The question of GST applicability on police bandobast services arranged for private events has...