HomeGSTBombay High Court Quashes GST Show Cause Notice To Wrong Address

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Show Cause Notice To Wrong Address

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court quashed the GST show cause notice in the interest of justice as the department failed to show the proof of service of notice at the correct address of the petitioner and remanded the matter back to the file of the department for adjudication of the show cause notice. 

The bench of Justice M. S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain directed the GST department to serve further notices and correspondence to the petitioner on the address at “M/s. Champion Steel Industries (P) Ltd., A/3, Ahmedabad Street, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 009” and at the email address registered with the department.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the show cause notice culminating into Order primarily on the ground of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner submitted that the show cause notices and order have been served on an address which does not belong to the petitioner and, therefore on this ground itself, the order passed on the basis of such notice which was not served is bad in law.

The department submitted they have issued the notices at the address mentioned in the show cause notice and order and same were not returned and, therefore, it should be presumed that the notice has been served on the petitioner and, therefore, there is no violation of principles of natural justice.

The court noted that the address records a wrong pin code number and wrong road and area. Then how this notice can be said to have been served on the petitioner whose office is at the address of “A/3, Ahmedabad Street, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 009” and not at Pydhonie. The department failed to shown any document to indicate that the Pydhonie address is that of the petitioner.

Case Details

Case Title: Champions Steel Industries Private Limited Versus Union of India: Bombay High Court

Case No.: Writ Petition (L) No.35234 Of 2023

Date: 16 December 2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Prasanna Namboodiri a/w Ms. Pratibha Namboodiri, Ms. Tejal S. Darekar, Ms. Pallavi Dabak and Mr. Rishabh Jain

Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Yogendra R. Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav 

Click Here To Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Forfeiture of Security Deposit Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has quashed the forfeiture of ₹15.67 lakh from a...

Gross GST Collections Rise 8.1% to ₹1.83 Lakh Crore in February 2026; Net Revenue Up 7.9%

India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections continued their upward trajectory in February 2026,...

How You Can Save Up To 13% GST On Wedding Venues?

Planning a big Indian wedding often begins with locking in the venue and caterer....

Impact on Gold and Silver Prices Amid the US–Israel Attack on Iran

Escalating military tensions involving the United States, Israel, and Iran have triggered sharp reactions...

More like this

Forfeiture of Security Deposit Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has quashed the forfeiture of ₹15.67 lakh from a...

Gross GST Collections Rise 8.1% to ₹1.83 Lakh Crore in February 2026; Net Revenue Up 7.9%

India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections continued their upward trajectory in February 2026,...

How You Can Save Up To 13% GST On Wedding Venues?

Planning a big Indian wedding often begins with locking in the venue and caterer....