Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Quashes Service Tax On ‘Manpower Recruitment Or Supply Agency’ Services For...

CESTAT Quashes Service Tax On ‘Manpower Recruitment Or Supply Agency’ Services For Setting-Up Of Koldam Hydropower Station On Satluj River

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has quashed the service tax on ‘manpower recruitment or supply agency’ services for setting-up of Koldam Hydropower Station On Satluj River.

The bench of S. S. Garg (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) has observed that the alleged services rendered by the appellant were related, bundled and undertaken in course of construction, repair, maintenance etc of the same dam i.e. cofferdam at KOLDAM which were specifically exempted by name up to 30.06.2012 vide Notification No. 17/2005-ST dated 07.06.2005.

National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC) entered into an agreement with M/s Italian Thai Development Public Company Limited (ITD) for construction of Hydro Electric Power Project on Satluj river referred to as KOLDAM. 

As per the agreement, the work of “Main Civil Works Package-I – Dam, Spillway and Power Intake Package” was awarded to M/s ITD. The scope of work also included such items which were not specifically mentioned in the Contract Documents but which are reasonably implied for the satisfactory completion of the entire scope of work envisaged under this contract unless otherwise specifically excluded from the scope in the letter of acceptance. 

M/s ITD further entered into another agreement with the appellant for excavation of clay, loading, transportation and unloading at dam site also referred in some documents as sub- contract „for clay extraction and hauling from Naulakha and Kanaid Clay Borrow‟; and supply of manpower for cleaning and caulking work at dam under KOLDAM Project. 

As per the said agreement, the appellant would excavate and load clay/aggregate material from designated borrows and unload at coffer dam site and then spread the same. 

With the aid of machinery and labour, clay/aggregate material was compressed layer upon layer for form earthfilled/corefilled dam. Further, the appellant was also granted work order for cleaning and caulking work at dam, spillway, galleries etc.

The department alleged that the appellant has rendered taxable services under the scope of “manpower recruitment or supply agency‟ and “site formation and clearance excavation and earthmoving and demolition‟ services, for which the appellant did not obtain service tax registration and did not deposit the due service tax liability thereon in government exchequer. 

The Commissioner (Appeals) has also held that the extraction and transportation of clay for the main dam does not involve transfer of property in goods which is leviable to VAT/Sales Tax. Similarly, providing of labour for cleaning and caulking work at main dam also does not involve transfer of property in goods which is leviable to VAT/Sales Tax. 

The tribunal has held that the services were provided to M/s NTPC which is a governmental authority and were exempted from levy of service tax. M/s NTPC is a public sector undertaking under the ownership of the Ministry of Power and is under control of the Government of India and is engaged in generation of electricity.

Read More: Today Is The Last Day To Fulfil These GST Compliances

Case Details

Case Title: M/s Austees Hydro Power & Construction Co Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Goods & Service Tax, Shimla

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 61088 of 2019

Date: 07.01.2025

Counsel For Appellant: A. S. Gill

Counsel For Respondent: Anurag Kumar

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Rs. 1.53 Crore GST Refund Dispute Over Place Of Supply Must Be Heard By Principal Bench: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi State Bench, has transferred a...

Can GST Liability Be Reduced If Recipients Do Not Reverse ITC? GSTAT Admits Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Patna State Bench, has admitted an...

GSTAT Upholds ITC Refund On Packaging Taxed At 18% Despite 5% GST On Bulk And Packaged Sulphur

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Expired E-Way Bill Alone Can’t Justify GST Penalty Without Evidence Of Tax Evasion: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow State Bench, has set aside...

More like this

Rs. 1.53 Crore GST Refund Dispute Over Place Of Supply Must Be Heard By Principal Bench: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi State Bench, has transferred a...

Can GST Liability Be Reduced If Recipients Do Not Reverse ITC? GSTAT Admits Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Patna State Bench, has admitted an...

GSTAT Upholds ITC Refund On Packaging Taxed At 18% Despite 5% GST On Bulk And Packaged Sulphur

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...