Ask Jurishour AI

HomeGSTGST Commissioner Can’t Review Order Passed By Appellate Authority : Delhi High...

GST Commissioner Can’t Review Order Passed By Appellate Authority : Delhi High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has held that the GST commissioner cannot review orders passed by appellate authority.

The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Dharmesh Sharma has observed that the Commissioner, while seeking to review an order passed under the Act and in purported exercise of powers vested by Section 107(2), cannot possibly sit over and above an order passed by the appellate authority. The power enshrined in Section 107(2) is concerned with the examination of the record of proceedings which may have been undertaken by an adjudicating authority. It clearly does not contemplate the Commissioner seeking to even attempt to review an order passed by the appellate authority. 

The bench stated that the power  wielded by the Commissioner with reference to Section 107(2) is rendered unsustainable.

The petitioner/assessee is stated to have applied for refund for the period April 2018 to March 2019 in terms of two applications dated 04 July 2019 and 09 July 2019. Two deficiency memos came to be issued by the respondents while considering the aforesaid applications. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the deficiency memos were duly attended to and all material duly supplied.

Since the refund was not released even thereafter, the petitioner is stated to have approached the respondents by way of representations dated 13 February 2020 and 27 February 2020.

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order of 24 May 2024.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S G.S Industries Versus Commissioner Of Central Tax And GST, Delhi

Case No.:  W.P.(C) 13149/2024

Date: 16.12.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Siddharth Malhotra

Counsel For Respondent: Aditya Singla

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITAT Allows 50% Presumptive Taxation for Doctor Despite Non-Filing of Return

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that merely...

Gold and Silver Prices Rise on MCX as Crude Oil Slides and Dollar Weakens Ahead of US Inflation Data

Gold and silver prices moved higher on the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) in early...

Tribunal Reforms Act 2026 Comes Into Force; Post-2021 Tribunal Members Get One-Year Extension

The Central Government has brought the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2026 into force with effect...

GSTAT Restores Tax and Penalty for Transporting Iron Scrap Without E-Way Bill Citing Intent to Evade Tax

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has allowed a Revenue appeal and restored...

More like this

ITAT Allows 50% Presumptive Taxation for Doctor Despite Non-Filing of Return

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that merely...

Gold and Silver Prices Rise on MCX as Crude Oil Slides and Dollar Weakens Ahead of US Inflation Data

Gold and silver prices moved higher on the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) in early...

Tribunal Reforms Act 2026 Comes Into Force; Post-2021 Tribunal Members Get One-Year Extension

The Central Government has brought the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2026 into force with effect...