HomeIndirect TaxesNo Service Tax Payable On Mandap Keeper Services: CESTAT

No Service Tax Payable On Mandap Keeper Services: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ahmedabad bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no service tax payable on mandap keeper services.

The bench of Ramesh Nair  (Judicial Member) and Raju  (Technical  Member) has observed that the department has sought to classify the service in the nature of Mandap Keeper Service under the category of ‘support service’. From the definition of ‘support services’, it is clear that only the services which are in the nature of outsourced services i.e. the functions that entities carry out in ordinary course of operations themselves but may obtain as service by the outsourcing from others for any reason whatsoever. The services in the instant case do not qualify as ‘support services’ and therefore, the services provided by the appellant are covered under the negative list.

The appellant/assessee Ahemedabad Municipal Corporation has challenged the demandsraised under the head of Mandap Keeper Services for the period prior to 01.07.2012 and later too. 

For the period prior to 01.07.2012 the assessee pointed out that the services provided by them were not taxable as they were covered in negative list. The appellant is a government authority carrying out statutory function entrusted to it under the 12th Schedule of Article 243W of the Constitution.

The assessee argued that since the appellant is a local authority under the direct control of Government of Gujarat there cannot be a charge of deliberate suppression of information or intention to evade duty. 

The tribunal held that the negative list of services excludes from the levy of service tax all the services provided by the Government except those listed in the Serial No. (i) to (iv) of Clause (a) of Section 66D. The services provided by the appellant do not fall under the clause (i) to clause (iv) of Section 66D(a). 

The tribunal found that after 01.07.2012 the services provided by the appellant are covered by the negative list.

Read More: Pre-Deposit By Appellant Not Payment Of Duty; CESTAT Directs Refund Along With 6% Interest

Case Details

Case Title: Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Versus C.S.T. Service Tax – Ahmedabad

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 10989 of 2019- DB

Date: 28.11.2024

Counsel For Appellant: Tushar R Shah

Counsel For Respondent: H. P. Shrimali

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Attachment of Bank Accounts Despite ITAT Stay Illegal: Delhi HC Quashes Coercive Recovery

The Delhi High Court has set aside the attachment of bank accounts holding that...

No GST Recovery Without Following Law: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court directed the immediate restoration of GST registration of the assessee...

Gold Smuggling | S. 108 Customs Statements Sufficient Evidence: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has upheld a penalty of Rs. 16 lakh imposed on...

Supreme Court Orders Creation of Supernumerary Post After Dispute Over ‘Correct Answer’ in Law Officer Exam

The Supreme Court has directed the Municipal Corporation Chandigarh to appoint two candidates to...

More like this

Attachment of Bank Accounts Despite ITAT Stay Illegal: Delhi HC Quashes Coercive Recovery

The Delhi High Court has set aside the attachment of bank accounts holding that...

No GST Recovery Without Following Law: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court directed the immediate restoration of GST registration of the assessee...

Gold Smuggling | S. 108 Customs Statements Sufficient Evidence: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has upheld a penalty of Rs. 16 lakh imposed on...