Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesBREAKING | Supreme Court To Deliver Judgement On Customs Dept's Review Petition...

BREAKING | Supreme Court To Deliver Judgement On Customs Dept’s Review Petition In Cannon Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Today the Supreme Court is likely to deliver judgement on the customs department review petition in the Cannon Case.

On 19 September, the bench of CJI DY Chandrachud Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra  reserved the Judgment on customs dept’s review petition on the issue whether Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) is the proper officer to initiate of the recovery proceedings under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act.

The customs department filed the review petition against the judgement of the Supreme Court Judgment in Canon India Private Ltd. versus Commissioner of Customs, in which it was held that the entire proceeding initiated by the Additional Director General of the DRI by issuing show cause notices in all the matters are invalid without any authority of law and liable to be set-aside and the ensuing demands are also set-aside.

Customs Dept. Stand – Cannon Case

The department contended that the judgement suffered from at least six apparent errors on record.

The department contended that the  DRI officers are a part of the finance ministry and exercise the powers of Customs officers.

Read More: Penalty On Co-Noticee Not Sustainable When Case Of Main Noticee Is Settled Under SVLDRS 2019: CESTAT

Case Details

Case Title: Commissioner Of Customs Vs. M/S Canon India Private Limited

Case No.: R.P.(C) No. 000400/2021

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...

Rs. 1,800 Shortfall in GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Can’t Defeat Appellate Remedy: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected because the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...